North Guangzhou Shenzhen network about car drivers threshold debate focus, the new deal is too stric-stellarium

North Guangzhou Shenzhen network about car drivers threshold debate focus, the new deal is too strict? Beijing and Shanghai need local hukou, Shenzhen residence certificate, Guangzhou local brand network, the new deal is too strict? With public opinion decoding 8, north of Guangzhou Shenzhen four on the same day issued a service management solutions about network car draft: Beijing and Shanghai have asked the driver did not mention the Guangzhou local household registration system; household registration, but must be less than one year, the Guangdong A license plate car to do network about cars; Shenzhen asked the driver is local household registration or to the residence permit may apply for. Known as "the history of the most stringent" about the new car as a "deep bomb" into the media arena, so all of a sudden "Beijing Beijing car Public opinion is seething with indignation.," "Shanghai Shanghai brand" and other rules of public debate. Just a few hours after the launch of the new deal on the Internet, some of the big drops in the car market have been issued for the first time, and the new policies should be discussed with the relevant departments and all sectors of the society". With the network car platform has been stated, this will be operators, network drivers, passengers and passengers have a multi impact of the "New Deal" caused by the public opinion turmoil is constantly fermenting. South China Daily reporter Chen Chen driver threshold debate focus, the first cause of public debate is that some places introduced a new car deal for the driver clearly put forward the threshold of household registration. For example, in the draft of Beijing and Shanghai, the driver must have a local census register, and the Shenzhen region requires that the citizens who hold the residence permit of the Shenzhen special economic zone can become the driver of the network vehicle. This rigid requirement immediately divides the "two" and "two" forces on the internet. Support the household registration threshold to the users that require network about car drivers must be local household registration can make the network about the car market more standardized, reduce security risks; against the household registration threshold of netizens said that local drivers to open network about cars is a geographical discrimination, a management "across the board" too. Micro-blog V users @ @ Su Ji Ning "in the" Sina Technology "for the network to investigate whether support the" household registration threshold "message said," this is the birth of territorial management of administrative policy supporting mechanism, "a foreign car driver passenger passenger alarm bluff and deceive, the newspaper, where the police? If the ordinary economic disputes, then Beijing police account for the jurisdiction of the outside world and how much jurisdiction?" This is micro-blog, there are many users of the "household registration threshold" next door not to regard it as right, @ @ Uncle Wang said, "if the taxi will require local nationals then there is no problem. But if all taxis need local drivers, I don’t know anywhere else, and more than half of Hangzhou’s taxis stop." In micro-blog "traffic safety Milo on whether to support the" network survey of Shanghai network about cars required the driver vehicle license local local household registration ", 1256 users to participate in 1057 expressed support, support rate as high as 84%, and another 171 people said they do not support, the total number of survey 13.6%. The views of the community network should be fully Jina car about the introduction of the new deal a few hours, the network about the car market "boss" drops to sit, the first time issued a strongly worded statement, said the harsh network about cars on

北上广深网约车司机门槛成争论焦点 新政是否过严?   京沪需本地户籍、深圳要居住证、广州要本地牌   网约车新政是否过严? 配图   舆情解码   8日,北上广深四地同日发布了网约车经营服务管理办法征求意见稿:北京、上海均要求司机系本地户籍;广州未提及户籍,但必须是粤A车牌、一年以内新车才可做网约车;深圳则要求司机是本地户籍或持居住证方可申请。被称为“史上最严”网约车新政如一颗“深水炸弹”投入媒体江湖,一下子令舆论哗然,“京人京车”“沪籍沪牌”等规定细则引发公众热议。   就在各地网约车新政发布的几个小时后,占据网约车市场大半壁江山的滴滴第一时间发表强硬声明,要与“有关部门以及社会各界一起探讨新政”。随着各网约车平台相继表态,这一将对运营商、网约车司机和乘客产生多方影响的“新政”所引发的舆论风波还在不断发酵。   ●南方日报记者 陈晨   司机门槛成争论焦点   首先引发公众热议的是,某些地方出台的网约车新政针对司机明确提出户籍门槛。例如,在北京和上海的征求意见稿中,网约车司机必须有本地户籍,深圳地区则要求持有《深圳经济特区居住证》的市民即可成为网约车司机。   这个硬性要求立即在网上划分出“挺”“反”两队人马。支持户籍门槛的网友认为,要求网约车司机必须是本地户籍可以使网约车市场更规范,减少安全风险;反对户籍门槛的网友则表示,本地司机才能开网约车则是一种地域歧视,有管理“一刀切”之嫌。   微博加V网友“@@苏纪宁”在“新浪科技”针对是否支持“户籍门槛”的网络调查下留言称,这是“属地管理”的行政配套机制催生的政策,“一辆外地车司机坑蒙拐骗乘客了,乘客报警了,报哪里的警?若是普通经济纠纷,那么北京民警对外地户口又有多大的管辖能力?”   此则微博下还有诸多网友对“户籍门槛”不以为然,“@@隔壁家的老王叔叔”表示,“如果全国的出租车都要求本地籍那就没问题。但是如果所有出租车都要司机本地籍,别的地方我不清楚,杭州立马一半以上的出租车停运。”   在微博“交通安全蜀黍”针对是否支持“京沪网约车新规要求司机本地户籍车辆本地牌照”的网络调查中,1256名参与网友中有1057名表示支持,支持率高达84%,另有171人表示不支持,占调查总人数的13.6%。   应充分集纳社会意见   网约车新政出台没几个小时,网约车市场“老大”滴滴坐不住了,其第一时间发表强硬声明,称严苛的网约车新政将导致车辆供给骤减、司机大幅减少、网约车车费翻倍、出行效率大幅降低,同时会导致司机群体失业等不良后果。   滴滴在声明中称,“上海、北京、深圳等地对车辆、司机门槛的规定,恐怕会一举抹杀滴滴过去4年为地方就业做出的大半努力,会让司机群体收入减少70%以上……大量的网约车司机将面对失业打击。”   滴滴的强硬表态造成舆论热度被进一步放大,众多平时享受滴滴服务的网友开始加入论战,同时认为滴滴服务存在隐患的网友则站在对立面上。一时间,针对网约车新政的讨论夹杂着对滴滴服务的观感一团乱战。   凤凰网评论文章《网约车最严“新规”到底想保护谁的利益》认为,“最严新规之下,以后相亲的时候能听到这样的问答了。女的问男的,你平时有空出去开开网约车吗?这个问题信息量非常大:是否有车,是否1.8T以上的车,轴距是不是2650毫米以上,是不是合资品牌,是不是本地户籍,本地车牌……”   对于这些争论,新华社评论《网约车细则要留出“窗口”》表示,“即使网约车细则最终落地,也应留出修改的‘窗口’……如今各地网约车细则陆续出台,但是细则的修改条件尚不明晰。开门立法之后似应充分集纳社会意见,适时进行必要调整。” 进入【新浪财经股吧】讨论相关的主题文章: