Beijing Tianli a paper ticket triggered a class action claims 3 investors, 3 million 800 thousand pullip

Beijing Tianli paper ticket triggered collective action 3 investor claims 3 million 800 thousand hot column capital flows thousands thousands of stocks the latest Rating Rating diagnosis simulated trading client sina finance App: Live on-line blogger to tutor you say stocks contest off 60 million "investment express" reporter recently from Guangdong international business law firm the lawyer was informed by Xie Liang, from Guangdong, Hubei, Jiangxi, Beijing 3 days (300399) stock investors commissioned on 31 August, the Beijing first intermediate people’s court for Beijing Tianli misrepresentation claims filing procedures. Less than a week later, September 5th has received a court summons, some cases will be the first evidence exchange in October 11th. A ticket triggered a collective investor claims on the evening of June 28, 2016, Beijing Tianli announcement said: in June 28, 2016, the company received the China Securities Regulatory Commission administrative penalty decision. The Commission finds that the existence of two illegal facts: first, Beijing Tianli listed in failing to disclose the relationship between Beijing Tianli in "IPO and listing on the gem prospectus (draft questionnaire)" (hereinafter referred to as the "prospectus") and "2014 annual report", not disclosure of association between Shanghai and primula. Two days, Beijing Levi perform procedures related transactions according to "Securities Law" article sixty-third "and the information disclosure of listed companies management approach" of article forty-eighth in the acquisition of Shanghai good reputation equity, Beijing Tianli acquisition relationship exists between the subject and good reputation of Shanghai Qian Yongyao, Beijing Tianli acquisition of Shanghai good reputation form association the transaction, the matter did not truthfully disclose. China Securities Regulatory Commission finds that the behavior of the parties in violation of the provisions of the Securities Act of sixty-third, constitute the Securities Act of 193rd, the information disclosure violations. Finally, the Commission decided: according to the "Securities Law" article 193rd of the provisions of the first paragraph, give a warning, to Beijing Tianli shall be ordered to make corrections, and impose a fine of 400 thousand yuan; on the basis of the "Securities Law" article 193rd of the provisions of the first paragraph, Qian Yongyao given a warning, impose a fine of 200 thousand yuan; on the basis of "provisions of article third paragraph 193rd of the securities law", Qian Yongyao given a warning, impose a fine of 400 thousand yuan; two merger, Qian Yongyao given a warning, impose a fine of 600 thousand yuan. The penalty out, they have led to a number of investors to Beijing Tianli initiated a civil claim class action. The price limit for twelve of investors suffered huge losses in June 3, 2015, statistics show that Beijing Tianli shares once trading, closed at 271.26 yuan per share. The next day the stock suspension until June 23, 2015 resumption. And at the date of resumption of trading, Beijing Tianli announcement said: in June 19, 2015 the company received China Securities Regulatory Commission the "investigation notice" (Inspection Corps investigation through word no. 152201), because of the company’s relationship and related matters not disclosed, Chinese Commission under the relevant provisions of the "People’s Republic of China Securities Law", the company decided to file survey. From the above case相关的主题文章: